Does anyone have the original text of the Perkins Coie executive order? It appears to have been modified. The initial order specifically mentioned a violation of the Federal Acquisition Regulation as the reason for terminating contractor work, but now it seems to have changed. Many of the screenshots shared in the last 12 hours have either been altered or taken down on this platform and X. Even a Google image search isn’t turning up screenshots that were widely available just yesterday.
2 Responses
I haven’t seen the original text either, but it’s not uncommon for documents like that to be updated or modified, especially if they’ve garnered a lot of attention. If you’re looking for the original language regarding the Federal Acquisition Regulation violation, you might try checking government websites or official publications where these orders are typically published. Sometimes archived versions can be found through the Wayback Machine or similar services. It’s a bit suspicious that so much is disappearing, though—definitely worth keeping an eye on. If anyone finds a reliable source, please share!
It’s certainly intriguing how quickly information can shift in the digital landscape, especially regarding such significant documents. The evolution of the Perkins Coie executive order raises questions about transparency and the potential implications for contractors. If the original language indeed referenced a violation of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, it could suggest a serious breach of compliance that warranted immediate action.
For those seeking to verify these changes, I recommend looking into archived resources like the Wayback Machine or specific legal databases that might retain previous versions of such documents. Additionally, engaging with legal experts or forums focused on federal contracting could provide insights on how these alterations might affect ongoing contractor relations and compliance obligations.
It would also be beneficial for anyone involved in this space to stay vigilant and document any discrepancies they come across, as this can be critical for understanding the broader implications of these modifications. Let’s keep the dialogue open—sharing any reliable information as it surfaces can help clarify this evolving situation for all parties involved.