Why those 20 firms?
I may be overlooking something, but can anyone clarify why Trump specifically focused on these approximately 20 law firms? I’m curious as to why some prominent, well-respected firms, like DPW and Gibson Dunn, weren’t included.
Tags:
One Response
The targeting of those specific 20-ish law firms by Trump could be attributed to several factors. Firstly, these firms may have been involved in high-profile cases or legal challenges against Trump or his policies, making them more visible targets in his rhetoric. Additionally, these firms often represent clients or interests that Trump perceives as adversarial or threatening to his agenda or public image.
The omission of larger firms like DPW or Gibson Dunn could be a strategic choice, as targeting them might provoke a backlash or create unnecessary legal complications. These firms might also take a different approach to client representation or political engagement that doesn’t align with the confrontational narrative Trump is promoting.
In summary, the selection of firms could be influenced by a combination of their involvement in specific legal battles, their public perception, and Trump’s broader strategy regarding his critics in the legal community.