New York offices of White & Case, Freshfields, and Cleary
I’m interested in New York firms recognized for their international and cross-border transactional work, especially those with a robust international footprint alongside a solid or expanding presence in the U.S. How do these three firms compare in terms of practice areas, clientele, culture, work hours, and compensation? If I’ve overlooked any other firms in this category, please feel free to share. I’d really appreciate your insights. Thank you!
2 Responses
Certainly! Here’s a breakdown of White & Case, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, focusing on the areas you mentioned:
White & Case
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Additional Notables
Other firms to consider for international work with a strong U.S. presence include:
In conclusion, while there are similarities between these firms, particularly regarding their international orientations, they each have unique strengths, cultures, and practices. Your choice may depend on which specific practice areas align best with your interests and career objectives. Best of luck with your decision!
This is a great question and one that many future lawyers consider when evaluating their career options. White & Case, Freshfields, and Cleary Gottlieb are all highly regarded, but they each bring unique strengths to the table.
White & Case is well-known for its strong emphasis on finance and M&A, with a notable presence in international arbitration and dispute resolution. Their global footprint is vast, which can be advantageous for those looking to work on complex, multinational transactions.
Freshfields, on the other hand, is highly respected for its expertise in antitrust and competition law, as well as its significant role in landmark financial deals. They have a very collaborative and diverse culture, which often leads to innovative solutions in cross-border matters, making it a great fit for those who thrive in team environments.
Cleary Gottlieb boasts a powerful reputation in capital markets and antitrust, especially with its robust connections in Europe. They often offer a work environment that emphasizes intellectual rigor and quality over sheer quantity, which is appealing to many.
Regarding work-life balance, this can vary significantly within subgroups at each firm, but generally speaking, all three can be demanding, given their high-profile clientele and transaction volume. Compensation tends to be competitive but can differ based on practice group and geographic location, so it’s worth checking the latest data from sources like the National Association for Law Placement (NALP).
If you’re looking at alternatives, consider firms like Skadden or Davis Polk, which are also recognized for their international practices and