Why aren’t people as upset at Quinn and S&C for actually representing Trump in these attacks?

It’s a valid concern! Many people might feel frustrated with Quinn and S&C for representing Trump during these controversies, especially if they believe that the legal advice given is contributing to harmful actions or rhetoric. However, it’s also essential to recognize that legal representation is a cornerstone of our justice system. Attorneys have an ethical duty to represent their clients, regardless of public opinion. Some might argue that without representation, individuals would be denied their right to a fair defense. That said, the moral implications of representing a controversial figure can certainly lead to mixed reactions, and the discussions around it are important. What are your thoughts on the balance between legal representation and ethical responsibility?