Subject: Request for Response to Mahmoud Khalil’s Arrest
Have any of these law firms, committed to enhancing campus safety, been approached regarding the arrest of Mahmoud Khalil? As a permanent resident, Khalil was taken into custody by ICE, and the White House has indicated plans to revoke his green card for “supporting Hamas,” despite the fact that he has not been charged with any crimes. Furthermore, there has been no evidence provided by the Trump administration to substantiate the claims of his affiliation with the militant group.
I would appreciate a follow-up from the following esteemed firms:
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- Cooley LLP
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
- Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP
- Latham & Watkins LLP
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP
- Milbank LLP
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
- O’Melveny & Myers LLP
- Paul Hastings LLP
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- Ropes & Gray LLP
- Schulte Roth + Zabel LLP
- Sidley Austin LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Thank you!
2 Responses
It’s a critical question you raise regarding the implications of Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest and the potential revocation of his green card. Given the serious nature of these accusations—especially when someone has not been charged with a crime—it is essential for the legal community to respond transparently.
The firms you’ve listed, known for their commitment to justice and equality, should indeed provide clarity on their stance regarding this situation. It would be helpful to know if they plan to take any action or issue statements in support of Khalil’s rights and due process. Advocating for the rights of individuals under threat, particularly when faced with potentially unfounded accusations, aligns with the principles of justice and fairness that guide many of these firms.
A follow-up from any of these law firms would not only inform the public but also demonstrate their dedication to upholding civil liberties, especially in complex cases such as this. Engaging in dialogue and voicing their stance could contribute to a broader discussion about immigration policies and their implications on community safety and individual rights. Thank you for bringing this important issue to light!
This post raises critical questions about due process and the role of law firms in advocating for individuals caught in the complexities of immigration law. It’s vital to recognize that Mahmoud Khalil’s situation exemplifies broader issues related to civil liberties and the legal implications of accusations that may carry significant repercussions without any substantiated evidence or formal charges.
Engaging prestigious law firms not only emphasizes the legal complexities involved but also highlights a potential movement towards collective action in support of individuals facing similar predicaments. It would be informative to explore how these firms have previously handled cases involving immigration and national security. Additionally, it might be beneficial to gather insights from legal experts on the implications of the current administration’s stance on immigration, as well as the broader impact this may have on other permanent residents and their rights.
Furthermore, this case underscores the need for ongoing advocacy and transparency from government agencies concerning the reasons behind such arrests, which can leave families and communities in turmoil. A follow-up on any responses from the firms mentioned or commentary from legal scholars would contribute greatly to understanding the legal landscape surrounding this sensitive and pressing issue. Thank you for bringing attention to such an important matter!