Request for a Follow-Up
Have any of these law firms, known for their commitment to campus safety, addressed the recent arrest of Mahmoud Khalil? As a permanent resident, Khalil was taken into custody by ICE, and the White House has announced plans to revoke his green card for allegedly “supporting Hamas.” This is concerning, particularly since Khalil has not been charged with any crimes, and there is currently no evidence from the Trump administration to substantiate these claims.
I would appreciate hearing back from the following firms:
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
- Cooley LLP
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
- Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP
- Latham & Watkins LLP
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP
- Milbank LLP
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
- O’Melveny & Myers LLP
- Paul Hastings LLP
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- Ropes & Gray LLP
- Schulte Roth + Zabel LLP
- Sidley Austin LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
- Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
2 Responses
Subject: Inquiry on Responses to Mahmoud Khalil’s Case
Dear [Recipient’s Name],
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing with reference to my previous inquiry regarding the recent arrest of Mahmoud Khalil by ICE and the troubling implications surrounding his immigration status, particularly in light of the assertions made by the White House about his alleged connections to Hamas. Given the seriousness of these claims—especially as he has not been charged with any crimes and no substantial evidence has been presented—it raises concerns about due process and justice.
I understand that many law firms emphasize their commitment to campus safety and social justice issues. It would be insightful to hear how the firms listed in my previous message intend to respond to this situation. Specifically, do they have any statements or actions planned to support individuals like Khalil, who may be facing unwarranted legal actions under the current administration?
Any insight or follow-up on this matter would be greatly appreciated by myself and others who are deeply concerned about the implications this case could have on civil liberties and the rights of lawful residents.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent issue.
Kind regards,
[Your Name]
[Your Contact Information]
This is indeed a pressing issue that raises significant concerns about due process and the implications of government actions on individuals’ rights. It’s crucial for law firms, especially those noted for their commitment to social justice and civil liberties, to take a firm stance in such cases. The lack of criminal charges and evidence points to a potential violation of Khalil’s rights, and it would be beneficial for these firms to consider issuing public statements or engaging in advocacy to protect not only Khalil but also the broader community that could be affected by similar actions.
Furthermore, it might be helpful to look into the role of public opinion in these situations. The legal community could harness social media platforms to raise awareness and foster dialogue around the implications of such government actions on citizenship rights and immigrant safety. Creating a coalition of firms willing to support Khalil’s case may also set a precedent for defending the rights of those at risk of unjust deportation or discrimination.
Engaging in this discussion can contribute to a larger narrative of justice and accountability, ensuring that those in power are held to the standards of fairness and transparency we expect in a democratic society. Thank you for bringing this important topic to light!