Title: Is Time Padding Becoming a Problem in Legal Billing?
In the world of legal services, it’s not uncommon for clients to discuss concerns over billing practices. Recently, I’ve been reflecting on a trend that’s become increasingly noticeable: the excessive padding of time in legal bills. As a General Counsel in private equity with substantial experience from my time at a partner firm, I’ve developed a keen eye for evaluating legal invoices. Typically, I’m comfortable paying bills without scrutinizing timesheets closely—after all, I understand the complexities involved and am willing to accept a reasonable oversight of around 10-20%.
However, a couple of recent experiences have raised some serious red flags. For instance, I was presented with a staggering bill for £8 million on a deal that was originally quoted at £3 million. This significant variance led me to request a sample of the timesheets. To my astonishment, there were seven different corporate associates recording charges for providing instructions related to competition on a single, discrete issue, which amounted to an astounding 15 hours. The actual time spent on the advice itself? Just 4.5 hours!
The situation became even more bewildering during a recent insolvency case where one associate logged 27 hours just on “researching correct filing procedure.” Such exaggerated billing raises many questions—is this normal practice, or do these instances reflect a broader issue within these firms, particularly those based in the U.S.?
This brings me to a crucial point: Is it merely a stroke of bad luck on my part, or is the pressure to meet billing targets leading associates to engage in these questionable practices? Are partners incentivizing this behavior, or are they merely overlooking it? It seems to pose a substantial risk to client relationships, especially when a transparent increase in hourly rates would likely be more acceptable to many clients.
As the industry evolves, it’s essential for both firms and clients to foster a clear and honest dialogue about billing practices. After all, establishing trust and transparency should be at the forefront of the attorney-client relationship. What’s your take? Have you experienced similar situations?
No Responses