The Risks of Child Maintenance Services: A Troubling Experience with Personal Data Disclosure
Navigating the complexities of child maintenance services can be a daunting task, especially when personal safety is at stake. My recent experience with the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) has highlighted the potential risks involved in sharing sensitive information, particularly in cases where safety from an abusive past can be compromised.
Two years ago, I managed to escape a controlling and abusive relationship. My partner’s behavior became increasingly aggressive—limiting my finances, isolating me from friends, and even subjecting me to physical harm. Despite numerous calls to the police, the narrative was twisted to make it seem like our arguments were equally volatile, partly because my ex would even injure herself to portray me as the aggressor.
Ultimately, I had no choice but to leave everything behind, including my name, employer, and location, in search of a safer life. I believed that I had taken sufficient measures to protect myself.
However, everything changed 12 weeks ago when I was contacted by the CMS, informing me that I had been named as the father of a young child. Given the child’s age, it was theoretically possible, but it was important to note that there had been no consensual relationship at the time of conception. I started the process by making my first payment and also initiated a parentage dispute to secure a DNA test, which I am currently awaiting.
The shocking twist came when my ex managed to locate me. To my dismay, the CMS had reportedly shared several sensitive details with her:
- My new legal name
- The town where I currently reside
- My annual salary and duration at my current job, obtained through a “real-time income check”
- The name of my employer
With this information at her disposal, my ex was able to approximate my income, trace job postings, and ultimately deduce where I worked. This led to her following me home one evening, which has left me feeling vulnerable and unsafe.
I have since reported this disturbing situation to the police, who have opened an investigation. In contrast, the CMS maintains that their actions were justified, insisting they haven’t violated any protocols. This raises a critical question: should agencies be allowed to divulge such personal information in a manner that can endanger individuals, particularly those with a history of abuse?
As I continue to navigate this harrowing chapter, I urge anyone in similar circumstances to remain vigilant about their personal safety and be aware of the potential risks involved
No Responses