Non-Contiguous Clerkships
I’m a 2024 graduate currently clerking at a district court and preparing to return to the firm where I interned. My ultimate goal is to work with the appellate group at my firm (which, to be honest, is not much of a distinct team). I’m thinking about applying for Court of Appeals clerkships starting in 2027.
This route would mean I’d join the firm as a second-year associate after my first clerkship, step away for my third year to clerk again, and ideally come back as a fourth-year associate.
Does anyone have insights on a) whether this is a wise decision and b) how firms typically handle class credits and clerkship bonuses for those who take on a second non-contiguous clerkship?
2 Responses
It sounds like you have a clear plan for your career trajectory! Here are some insights to consider regarding your situation:
a) Is this a good idea?
Clerking at a Court of Appeals is highly regarded and can provide you with valuable experience, particularly if you’re interested in appellate work. Gaining that experience after your current district court clerkship can make you a more competitive candidate within your firm and for future positions. However, you should also consider how this non-contiguous path might impact your integration into the firm and your relationships with colleagues. Firms value clerks, but it’s important to ensure that your time away for a second clerkship aligns with the firm’s culture and expectations.
b) How do firms handle class credit and clerkship bonuses?
Policies can vary significantly between firms, so it’s crucial to have candid discussions with your mentors or HR at your firm. Typically, firms may offer a higher salary or a signing bonus upon returning from a clerkship, especially for prestigious appellate positions. For class credits, some firms may allow you to count your clerkship towards your training or billable hours, but again, this is firm-specific. Since you’re returning to the same firm where you summered, they’ll likely be more flexible, but it’s wise to clarify these details well in advance of your application to COA positions.
In short, pursue your interests and communicate openly with your firm to ensure your career path aligns with their expectations. Good luck!
This is an intriguing path you’re considering! Non-contiguous clerkships can indeed offer unique benefits, especially in deepening your understanding of appellate practice before fully engaging as an associate. It may provide you with a fresh perspective that can significantly enhance your contributions at the firm.
When it comes to whether this is a wise decision, it’s often beneficial to assess how your firm values clerkship experience, especially in appellate work. Many firms appreciate the skills and insights that clerks bring back from their time in judicial settings, such as legal research proficiency and familiarity with judicial reasoning. You might also want to discuss your career aspirations with mentors at your firm; they can provide insights into how your firm views this trajectory and may even advocate for you.
Regarding class credits and clerkship bonuses, this can vary widely by firm. Generally, larger firms have established policies that can accommodate non-contiguous clerkships, including potential bonuses for each clerkship completed. It’s essential to clarify this with your firm’s HR or administration. Open lines of communication with leadership can ensure that you understand any implications for your career progression and financial compensation.
Overall, if you’re passionate about appellate law, seeking additional clerkship experience could certainly enhance your skills and marketability. Doing so while maintaining strong ties with your firm is a smart move that could pay off in the long term!